Find the first PPAP rejection before your customer does
Eighteen elements, each with its evidence, and a rehearsal that stops exactly where a reviewer would.
In brief
- Every PPAP element shows whether it is required at the chosen level, its status and the evidence behind it.
- A rejection rehearsal walks the package in AIAG element order and stops at the first element a reviewer would reject.
- Elements after the stop are reported as unknown, not as clean.
The package, element by element
The coolant pump is being prepared for a Level 3 submission. MIYOQA lists the PPAP elements with whether each is required, its disposition, the status the engine derives from the records, and the evidence behind it.
The part submission warrant itself, element 18, is generated from the record on request rather than typed.
Rehearse the rejection
Before anything is sent, MIYOQA rehearses the review. It walks the package in AIAG element order, the way a customer's supplier quality engineer would, and stops at the first element that would be rejected.
The rehearsal is careful about what it does not know. Fixing the DFMEA does not make the remaining elements pass; it only lets the review continue into them. Elements below the stop are reported as unknown, not clean, and the rehearsal states that it predicts, not that it speaks for the customer.
Why it matters
A rejected PPAP costs weeks. MIYOQA shows the first rejection while it can still be fixed in-house, and never reports an element as ready because nobody looked at it.
Demonstration case. The records come from Project M, a synthetic programme that ships with MIYOQA for training and evaluation. No customer data is shown.
More case studies
From leak rejects to a root cause, in eleven steps
A pump housing drifted out of flat and leak rejects rose. MIYOQA worked the problem from the records, and left every decision to the engineer.
Read the case
When a Ppk of 2.03 is not good enough
The index was well above the requirement, and MIYOQA still blocked the release. A capability number is only as good as the process behind it.
Read the case